Monday, 13 July 2020

VBCW HEREFORD - THE BATHTUB HYPOTHESIS (2)

The first post in this irregular series of blogposts is HERE

Frank Chadwick’s “Bathtub Barbarossa” campaign started with a distinct advantage for ‘bathtubbing’: a pre-made hex map (from the “Fire in the East” boardgame, with a scale of a one inch hex = 16 miles or 25km ‘on the ground’).

However, Hereford1938 VBCW starts with something else - knowledge both of the dimensions of our available “tabletop” and of the County of Herefordshire ‘on the ground’.

Our usual “Big Games” are played on a number of a 8ft x 6ft tables. Normally, three such tables joined together to make, dependent upon the demands of the Big Game, a playing area of 8ft x 18ft or 6ft x 24ft. But what if, instead of three such tables, we were able to expand to six such tables, arranged in two rows? Arranged in the right manner, this would provide a massive - nearly square - playing area of 16feet x 18feet.

In real life, Herefordshire is slightly longer than it is wide. But not by much: the County is shaped somewhat like a “slightly squeezed circle”, being approximately 30 miles “wide” (e.g. east-west) and 32 miles “long” (e.g. north-south). “Approximately” is good enough for these purposes, as the “county lines” are highly irregular on the ground in any event.

The “bathtub challenge” is therefore to represent the “slightly squeezed circle” of Herefordshire (30 miles wide by 32 miles long) on a “six table” tabletop (16feet x 18feet). Looked at this way, the “scale” suggests itself: 2 miles = 1 foot. This even leaves us with a bit “left over” all round the tabletop, useful for the wargamer’s detritus of rules, dice and coffee cups (i.e. the County measures 15feet x 16feet vs the available tableop of 16feet x 18feet).

Back to the “Campaign Map”. We can’t make a useful map measuring 15feet x 16feet. But we could make a useful “Campaign Map” measuring 15inches x 16inches. This gives us a “map scale” of one inch (on the map) to one foot (on the tabletop) to two miles (on the ground).

It could be that the “Campaign Map” should use “hexes”, but to keep matters simple, one inch squares would be better, making it much easier to “translate from map to table”, which is the key for our purposes. With such a scaled map, all that the wargamer really needs to remember is that “one inch on the map equals one foot on the tabletop”, leaving the umpires to make sure that the map reflects “the ground” on the basis of “one foot on the tabletop equals two miles on the ground”.

After a bit of research, here are the “as the crow flies” distances between Hereford and the principal towns that have featured in the Hereford1938 campaign, given first according to “on the ground”, then in squares “on the map”, and finally in feet “on the tabletop”:

Hereford to Hay on Wye -    22 miles (11 squares on the map) (11 feet on tabletop)
Hereford to Leominster -     12 miles (6 squares on the map) (6 feet on tabletop)
Hereford to Ledbury -          12 miles (6 squares on the map) (6 feet on tabletop)
Hereford to Presteigne -       19 miles (9.5 squares on the map) (9.5 feet on tabletop)
Hereford to Ross on Wye -  11 miles (5.5 squares on the map) (5.5 feet on tabletop)
Hereford to Bromyard -       13 miles (6.5 squares on the map) (6.5 feet on tabletop)
Hereford to Ludlow -           22 miles (11 squares on the map)  (11 feet on tabletop)

while two other interesting  distances between towns can also be calculated:

Ludlow to Ross on Wye - 33 miles (16.5 squares on the map) (16.5 feet on tabletop) (north south)
Presteigne to Bromyard -  25 miles (12.5 squares on the map) (12.5 feet on tabletop) (east west)

[Just for fun, Hereford to London - 117 miles (58.5 squares on a map/58.5 feet on tabletop - a tennis court is 78 feet long) Such gives a good indication of the “bathtub scale”, but in real life, well, we have to stop somewhere.]

Now, it must be acknowledged that some of our Hereford VBCW towns are not actually in Herefordshire, but just on the border - Ludlow in Shropshire, Hay on Wye in Brecknockshire (now part of Powys) and Presteigne in Radnorshire (also now part of Powys). Given that our scaled representation of Herefordshire is actually a little smaller than our available tabletop, however, we can still happily “adopt” these towns into a bathtub - based “Biggest Game of All”.

Thursday, 2 July 2020

DOMESDAY BOOK HEREFORD - AND A BIG MISTAKE

After this blogpost on the Siege of Hereford in 1055AD, a glance at Hereford some thirty years later, on the publication of the Domesday Book in 1086AD - see HERE - when both manorial lord and manorial tenant was the Bishop of Hereford.

Hereford was clearly going through tough times. Property values had roughly halved in the twenty years from 1066 to 1086, down from four pounds fourteen shillings to two pounds ten shillings. As this table demonstrates, Hereford was far from being the busiest place even within the County - having only 19 households as opposed to 48 for Shobdon, 59 for Bromyard, and an astonishing 101 for Hanley Castle (now only in a small village in The Malverns, and officially part of Worcestershire).

Hereford's inferiority to Hanley in the 11th Century may have been due to Hereford being ruled by the Bishop, but Hanley being royal land, in the ownership of William the Conqueror (who had clearly nicked it after 1066 from the defeated Saxon lord, Brictric, son of Algar, who had large landholdings across the Midlands (including the Earldom of Gloucester). The Domesday Book records Brictric having 86 landholdings in 1066, and in 1086, er............nil). Such 'land redistribution' may well have derived as much from personal revenge as public policy, for William Dydes' 18th Century "History and Antiquities of Tewkesbury" notes (p.23) of Brictric:

"This Brictric (being ambassador at the court of Baldwin, Earl [or Count] of Flanders) Maud [known to history as Matilda], the Earl's daughter, fell violently in love with him, but being slighted, she afterwards married William the Conqueror, and after the Norman Conquest, revenge still rankling in her breast for such a slight, and the Conqueror being tempted with his large estate, she worked Brictric's ruin, who was seized in his manor of Hanley and sent [as] prisoner to Winchester, where he died without issue, and was there buried....[and his lands taken]...."

Definitely not one for rejection - a 28mm Queen Matilda.
 A limited edition figure from the 2016 Crisis Show,
very nicely painted by Scrivs. See his blog HERE
Equally, of course, Hereford's 1086 position may simply have reflected it's experience in the 1055 Siege. The volumes upon the subsequent VBCW Siege of Hereford, some eight hundred and fifty years later, have yet to emerge from the publishers....

A (probably Edwardian) representation of Matilda. Married to William at 19,
crowned as Queen of England at 37. When she was crowned in Winchester
Cathedral, it is likely (but presumably not at all co-incidental) that Brictric was
 already languishing in the dungeons of Winchester Castle. More on Matilda
and Brictric (including the illustration upon which her 28mm figure
was clearly based) HERE